Task 2 Essay Sample: Tourism

By investing in tourism we can earn a lot of revenue and growth in national economy. At the same time it destroys the local culture. What is your opinion?  

Tourism is one of the biggest industries worldwide. It has grown, especially over the last few decades, by leaps and bounds. This is happening because the global citizen now takes even the slightest of chances to visit uncharted territory. So, all the countries are eager to invest more and more in tourism. It has its rich rewards, but there are drawbacks too. At the forefront of all demerits of tourism is the impact on local culture. Still, in my opinion, such demerits cannot outweigh the benefits of the tourism industry.

In the modern age the culture of one country or society is open for all to observe and take part in. When in coming tourists get in touch of a local culture they do not necessarily destroy it. It is understandable that they leave a bit of their own cultural identity in the place they have visited. But that is not destruction rather a healthy demonstration of cultural mixing that is happening incessantly all over the world in other ways too, e.g. international media.

On the other hand, if we miss out on the far reaching benefits of the tourism industry being foolishly bogged down by the illusionary ghouls of cultural destruction, we are only loosing. In reality tourism does not taint a local culture, rather it fortifies it. Tourist visiting places do not only sight-see but want to experience the diverse heritage and customs also. So, since destroying or transforming the local culture only makes a locality less attractive to spectators, tourism provides ample motivation to preserve our cultural identity.

To conclude, we must declare tourism as a boon that encourages the peoples of the world to be themselves, not like the others, while rewarding those who have valued and glorified their culture in terms of much needed revenue.

Nowadays both scientists and tourists can go to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

In this modern day, travelling to places off the beaten track like the South Pole is no longer an elusive dream for not only scientists but also tourists. While this brings about some undeniable benefits, I would argue that the drawbacks are greater.

On the one hand, it is beneficial for both scientists and tourists to be able to visit remote natural places. Firstly, it allows scientists to conduct practical research or experiments. For example, scientists can have a closer look on the habitat or the characteristic behaviour of the indigenous animals there such as penguins and whales seals. Secondly, travel agencies will gain profit when travelling to isolated places becomes feasible. The South Pole is unquestionably a fascinating destination compared to other familiar places of interest around the world and will attract a massive influx of visitors as a result.

On the other hand, it seems to me that the potential risks involved in this development deserve more consideration. One reason is that the trip to remote areas such as the South Pole poses great dangers to visitors. The weather there is consistently severe with a multitude of snow storms and snowslides not to mention tourists are under threat of being attacked by wild animals. Furthermore, travelling to these places can be extremely costly. Huge investment in transportation and equipment is of indispensable necessity in order to ensure absolute safety of visitors. As a result of these trips only serve a certain number of upper-class people whereas considered unaffordable for ones with lower income.

In conclusion, although there are good reasons why travelling to remote natural places should be in contemplation, I hold a strong a belief that the setbacks outweigh its advantages.

Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons?

Solutions to change negative attitudes. Travel destinations all over the world welcome a growing influx of foreign visitors every year. Residents living in these places are, however, finding this development displeasing. There are many reasons for this phenomenon and steps need to be taken to improve the situation.

There are a variety of reasons for this hostility. The main reason is that the arrival of foreign tourists invariably js accompanied by an increasing level of pollution. Many tourists dispose of garbage at their own convenience, with complete disregard for surrounding environment. Specifically, New Zealand’s government has ordered for the castle that was built for the filming of ‘Lord Of The Rings’ to be immediately demolished upon completion of the movie, for fear that, should its existence be resumed, travel enthusiasts would flock to the castle and litter all over the place. Moreover, international tourism also triggers the possibility of a disease outbreak. For instance, in Vietnam, many people died after a visitor from Hong Kong carried the H5N1 virus to the country in 2003.

Fortunately, several measures could be taken to solve this problem. Firstly, governments should encourage tourists to put waste into the right place and to be mindful of their surroundings through some campaigns or instructions. Additionally, governments should continue to conduct thorough health inspection at international airports. Healthy travelers should be educated on the symptoms of viruses while those who exhibit these symptoms must immediately be quarantined.

To conclude, there are various reasons for this resentment and steps need to be taken to tackle this complication.

Model 2

Many local residents believe worldwide travelling adversely affects their country. Although the reasons for this attitude are varied, several solutions can be adopted to handle this problem. It is totally comprehensible why many people habour unwelcoming attitudes towards international tourists.

The first reason is the contribution of travellers to the country’s environmental degradation due to their irresponsibility. A lot of tourists throw rubbish into the surroundings without a second thought which contributes greatly to the air, marine and soil contamination. Many places of interest are left in the seriously polluted status. For example, beaches in Vung Tau City famous for their stunning beauty are now comparable to garbage dump despite all the attempts in reducing waste by the local community. Furthermore, international tourism increases the odds of spreading infectious diseases. Only one infected individual can be a great threat to the whole community. For example, in 2003, virus H5N1 spread to Viet Nam caused a multitude of fatalities.

Fortunately, a course of actions can be taken to tackle the problem. The government should enforce strict regulations as well as heavy punishment on guilty cases in order to raise the awareness of international tourists. Travellers should be encouraged to put waste into the right place or to use public transport if possible to reduce the pollution. Another remedy is that there should be medical checks at airports and borders. This will halt infectious diseases from spreading to the local residents.

In conclusion, only by addressing the local residents’ concerns will this negative attitude be changed.

Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that the change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefit. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some would argue that tourism is threatening the survival of local culture, so it should be restricted in some places, while others believe we should not blame tourism for the changes that always happen inevitably. While banning tourism is a quick and easy solution to protect local culture, I believe that properly managing and controlling tourism industry would help to promote and enrich the local culture.

On the one hand, tourism brings about negative environmental and social impacts on the host community. Firstly, foreigners’ behaviors can have detrimental effects on the cultural values of locals. For example, activities which are related to drug addiction, alcohol problem, prostitution, and crime often occur in the host community when interacting with tourists, infringing and erasing cultural values of the local community. Secondly, tourism poses high threats to cultural resources when mass construction of hotels and resorts is carried on nearby the temples, historical or heritage sites, destroying local habitats. However, I believe these problems can be solved if the government imposes proper laws and control on tourism.

On the other hand, some people are against the idea of blaming tourism alone for the detrimental factor to local culture. Their view is that the way of life is always changing regardless of the presence of tourists. People always urge to learn new things, to share and to integrate to the rest of the world. If they are obsessed with the new world and highly disregard their local culture, they will, without any doubt, lose their identity and their own culture during the interaction of the world. I believe tourism may help in this situation by promoting and enriching local culture. Tourism encourages the preservation of traditional customs, festivals that might otherwise have been forgotten. While interacting with tourists, locals are more aware of their rich cultures and create a better understanding of their origin and identity.

To conclude, allowing tourism to promote local culture is preferred as it helps to preserve cultural values of the host community. However/nevertheless, tourism 243 should be controlled so that it will not impose threats to the local culture.

International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impacts on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?

International tourism becomes increasingly popular all over the world. While I accept that this trend can sometimes have harmful impacts on local inhabitants and the environment, I believe that it is more likely to have positive effects.

On the one hand, international tourism can be stressful for a number of reasons. Firstly, local residents would be involved in unavoidable effects. Some foreigners who do not understand local distinctive conventions are willing to behave in a bad way with people living there. Consequently, domestic residents no longer have a sympathetic view with foreign tourists. Secondly, international travel can cause detrimental problems for the environment. Some impolite travellers not only speak loudly instead of keeping tourist destinations peaceful as regulation but also throw a lot of rubbish into those places. As a result, the image of the host country will decrease dramatically.

However, I would argue that these drawbacks are outweighed by the benefits. The first reason is that thanks to this tourism development, the host country easily enhance its attractive image to the world. For example, some distinctive customs are broadcasted widely to draw tourist’s attention to come to visit and learn more about the country. Last but not least, this enhancement also brings an economic efficiency to the domestic country because tourism is considered one of the most advantageous industries at present. There will be more tourists spending their travelling budget on comfortable services provided by the local companies. That results in a significant revenue from this tourism and service industry.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the positive benefits of international tourism are more considerable than the potential impediments.

Model 2

In the modern world, traveling to overseas destinations is enjoying an increasing popularity. This fires up a heated controversy over whether this prevalent trend produces more positive or negative impacts. While there are several undesirable influences caused by international travel, I would argue that it is generally more beneficial in various ways.

On the one hand, the idea of traveling abroad may sound unattractive to some people for a number of reasons. Firstly, mass tourism to a region may generate harmful effects on local cultures. Being exposed to foreign visitors with different cultures, local people may suffer from a disruption in their way of life, leading to the erosion of traditional values and customs. Secondly, international travel contributes to the exacerbated environmental issues. For instance, air travel exhausts more greenhouse gas emissions into the biosphere, which increases air pollution and global warming on the whole.

On the other hand, the widespread presence of international travel could result in a variety of benefits. One of the major advantages is that it enhances mutual understanding about distinct cultural backgrounds. Being given the chance to experience cross-cultural encounters, travelers can acquire deeper knowledge about other cultures and histories, gradually developing their empathy with other people. In addition, it is unquestionable that tourism provides local residents with a great source of income. If a particular area is promoted as a popular tourist destination, thousands of people can be lifted out of poverty, and given a better quality of life. In fact, the tourism industry is proven to be one of the backbone industries of many countries, around the world, accounting for a significant share of their gross national products.

In conclusion, it seems evident that the advantages brought by international tourism far outweigh its disadvantages.

Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that travellers should take social and environmental on us. While some people do not accept this point of view, I completely concur that this responsibility belongs to tourists. The reason why tourists have to be responsible for environmental issues is that tourism, along with its booming development, has brought many negative impacts on the local environment.

Firstly, many famous tourist attractions are endangered nowadays because of tons of trash and pollution spread | by the tourists. For example, -Maldives, a famous tropical paradise on the globe, has become the world’s biggest rubbish island owing to the fact that more than 10,000 tourists come here every week and discharge their waste there. Secondly, the more the tourist destinations are being launched, the more quickly nature habitats of wildlife animals disappear. Therefore, this situation cannot be handled by the national government solely, but many visitors could give their hands to protect these attractions and their biodiversities.

 Apart from the practical drawbacks expressed above, I believe that there is another problem related to society. Every country has its own cultures values and religious believes that travellers need to respect and follow. Therefore, if they deny obeying the rules set by local authority, this could raise | conflicts between travellers and indigenous- people. Another fact to note that the increase in the number of visitors could lead to the over-consumption of resources, which is not compatible with the sustainable development of the country.

In conclusion, I totally agree with the view that travellers should go hand in hand with locals in order to reserve the famous destinations.

Some people believe that tourism promotes the economy while other argue that tourism destroy the environment. Discuss both views.  

During the past few years, the tourism industry has become the leading sector of national development. However, while some people claim that the economy is boosted thanks to tourism growth, others criticize it for doing harm to the environment. This essay will look at both views.

On the one hand, tourism sector contributes a huge revenue to the country through economic activities run by societies around tourist attractions. It is clear that tourism is now becoming an industry that creates thousands of jobs for citizens in terms of its management, protection as well as promotion. Moreover, it helps improve the income of local residents through selling souvenirs and providing tourism services such as hotels and entertainment. Therefore, citizen’s living standard could be upgraded and the unemployment rate could be reduced. All of these economic activities crucially contribute to achieving the goals of government to provide job opportunities and to bring the prosperity of society.

On the other hand, tourism can have a negative impact on the environment. Specifically, excessive building like roads, and hotels that destroys natural habitats of animals and spoils the landscape. At the same time, tourism also causes pollution in some crowded areas. Moreover, it puts pressure on local resources such as food, water, and energy. However, I believe that environmental protection is the parts of tourism development on how government allocates the budget to tourism sector for creating a clean environment or promoting ecotourism in which environment are the basis of tourism.

To sum up, I think that although tourism can drive a better economic growth, we should not lose our sight that tourism also can harm our local environment.

International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?

It is true that the growth of the international tourism has exerted positive influences on tourists as well as the host country. While there are some drawbacks of international travel, I still believe that these cannot overshadow the benefits.

On the one hand, the downsides of international travel are varied. In terms of the tourists themselves, travel expenses to famous tourist destinations such as Ha Long Bay in Vietnam are grossly inflated. Travelers may be overcharged for everything from a taxi, accommodation or a meal in a restaurant. In terms of the host country, international travel can also pose a threat to the environment. If the amount of rubbish illegally dumped into the surroundings and the construction of hotels and tourist attractions were unregulated, it would lead to a rise in the levels of pollution and greatly damage the environment. For example, many beach resorts in Vietnam have become concrete jungles of high-rise hotels and apartments to satisfy the increasing demand for accommodation of mass tourists from Europe.

On the other hand, I still believe that the advantages of international travel outweigh the disadvantages. First, a trip to another country can provide travelers with countless opportunities to gain a lot of fascinating experiences of cuisine and culture. For instance, when foreign tourists come to Vietnam, they have a chance to use chopsticks, enjoy traditional meals and have a thorough insight into local life. Second, the influx of foreign tourists can also contribute greatly to the development of the host country through the provision of jobs and services for the developing hotels and construction industries. This positively affects the host country’s economic expansion and ameliorate local citizens’standards of living.

In conclusion, it appears to me that the drawbacks of international travel cannot eclipse the benefits.

International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?

In line with the shift in time, a recent phenomenon on the tourism of citizens indicates some concerns in terms of problems from international tourists. This essay will elaborate on some probable causes and positive solutions which can improve this situation.

There are some widespread reasons why local people consider that tourists who are from other countries would have some negative impacts on their societies. Firstly, the consciousness of tourists about saving the environment of the country where they visit is seen as the main reason, for example, some foreign tourists often draw their marks on the wall in historical places like temple or museum as well as litter beautiful landscapes such as famous beaches. Secondly, nowadays some tourists take advantages from visiting another country to stay illegally. For instance, there are a large number of people from developing countries travel to South Korean nowadays, and their purpose is to reside without being accepted immigration, so it would be complicated for the government of the country to manipulate illegal immigrants.

Therefore/Subsequently/Inevitably, some measures should be implemented to deal with these issues of international tourism. It is necessary for the host countries to be strict to tourism agencies about ensuring that they would not let their customers commit any unfit behavior which is mentioned above by giving some strict rules. For example, the financial and prison punishments for tourists who lack awareness should be implemented. Another remedy is that local people especially youngsters can participate in some volunteer activities to introduce the beauty of their culture and landscape to tourists so the visitors have more respect for the country they visit.

In conclusion, by conducting some positive solutions to resolve common negative belief of local people, this situation would be better.

Model 2

It is true that nowadays transnational travel is becoming progressively more affordable, which has driven the growth of tourism industry. While there exist several drawbacks from the upsurge in global travels, I believe they are outweighed by the substantial benefits.

The potential impacts of this trend on individual countries are definite. The foremost repercussion is that the environment would be exacerbated. Tourists are more likely to litter in some resorts, which may contribute to air pollution, water contamination and land degradation. The construction of tourist amenities such as hotels and restaurants also deprive wild animals of natural habitats, which places them at risk. Moreover, differences in social background and cultural values may make the discrepancy of foreigners and locals on some issues more indelible. For example, Arabians often consider westerners their foes and their divergence seem to be inherent; therefore, they may show hostility against visitors from these countries.

However, the benefits/virtues/assets from a growing number of international tourists far outweigh the aforementioned demerits/weak aspects. First of all, both the locals and the state where global tourism is popular are economically motivated. It opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world especially tourism companies. A lot of jobs would be generated, which would help improve the living standards of the citizens. This is mostly beneficial for underdeveloped countries where people are struggling to earn a living. For example, Thailand, a previously impoverished country, has managed to alleviate its poverty by focusing on tourism.

In conclusion, the contraction in international travel has brought a wealth of significant benefits to the natives, rather than some drawbacks including environmental effects and hostile attitudes towards visitors from locals.